
The Medicare Prescription
Plan is a Small Glimpse Into the Future
by John Riet
Did you ever go to see a really bad horror movie? I mean really
bad. The kind of movie that's so predictable you find yourself
saying, "I bet when she opens that door, he's going to
stab her." And sure enough, the dumb bimbo opens the door
and the masked psychotic deformo stabs her through her ample
bosom. The political equivalent to such a movie is happening
right now in the form of the recently enacted Medicare Prescription
Drug Plan.
Those
of us who have learned far too well what it means for a nation
to adopt a "free" health care system responded to
the passage of the Drug Plan with a resounding, "don't
go in there!"
I've
been keeping up with this for a few years now and I'm familiar
with the effects of a socialist health care system forced onto
a population: the extended waiting periods, the rising costs,
the lack of incentives for and thus, the shortage of health
care workers. The list of catastrophes goes on and on. I've
watched for years what's been happening in much of Europe, Canada,
and communist countries like Cuba.
Great
Britain's National Health Service was implemented on July 5,
1948. The first year costs of the program were 52 million pounds
higher than the original estimates. Not so coincidentally, the
initial costs of our Medicare Prescription Drug Plan was roughly
$400 billion. Before it was even put into effect on January
1 of this year, that estimate nearly doubled to $796 billion.
And all our plan does is "help out" with the prescriptions
of our seniors. It isn't full-fledged health care coverage.
Had
you asked me before it took effect what I thought would happen
as a result of the new Medicare plan, I would have probably
said, "Longer wait for prescriptions to be filled, higher
costs, less incentives for new pharmacies to open or remain
open, and a shortage of resources." After all, it's been
happening for decades in other countries. Why would I think
anything would be different here?
Would
I have been right?
Testimony
is being heard in Washington this week before the Senate Finance
Committee regarding the horror stories (no pun intended) of
this socialist program. Smaller pharmacists are under financial
stress because they are now doing more work and getting paid
less - the government, after all, does not pay these pharmacists
the fees they would have earned in a free market system. The
average cost to fill a prescription is about $7 to $8. Under
the new Medicare plan, the pharmacist gets paid only $5. It
doesn't take a genius to figure out how long one can stay in
business when revenue fails to exceed costs.
Additionally,
it can take hours for a pharmacist to verify coverage enrolled
in various plans. I know. You're thinking, "no way!"
But yes. More bureaucracy actually slows things down. As a result,
many seniors and disabled people are having trouble getting
their prescriptions filled.
Not
surprisingly, these smaller pharmacies, some of which are the
closest and most convenient for many seniors, are being shut
down due to their inability to compete with the bigger drugstore
chains. Remember that this is different from a mom-and-pop store
being closed because a Wal-Mart opened up down the street. The
demise of small pharmacies is the result of government intervention,
not free market forces.
So,
let's see
longer wait for prescriptions to be filled,
higher costs, less incentives for new pharmacies to open or
remain open, and a shortage of resources. Yep. You can pretty
much set your watch by it.
Now
imagine this Prescription Drug Plan applied to our entire health
care system. In spite of the obvious evidence, including our
current experience, there are still those who insist that we
adopt such a program. Do you want to ask me what I think will
happen if we do so? Or can you guess what I might say?